How the media's week of dark ideas ended with a bang.
|
|
The man who tried to assassinate the president last week left a manifesto. Read it, then read the New York Times from the same week. The overlap is not subtle. In this deep dive, I walk through three things the paper published just a week earlier — an interview, an op-ed, and a profile — and what each one normalized. |
Specifically, I walk through: |
The New York Times interview that rationalized murder as a form of justice
The NYT op-ed that identified a demographic enemy and called for policies to dispossess them
The NYT profile that held up a deeply troubling candidate as the future of the Democratic Party
How these pieces work together to erode the moral fabric that holds a society in one piece
And the three specific accusations in the alleged shooter’s manifesto that any reader of that paper would recognize
|
Most of the journalists shaping this narrative sit well to the left of the average American. They know that. What they also know is that nothing moves the needle like a well-reported story that takes a radical premise for granted. By the end of this piece, you'll be able to see the connections — who the paper covers and how, which ideas get warmly considered and which get ignored, what the whole project adds up to — and what it means for the rest of us. |
|
|
Read the rest — free for 7 days. |
Friday and Sunday coverage is for members only. Join our supporting readers who get the full story every morning — in under 5 minutes. |
|
|
Members get full access to: |
• Six mornings a week, nothing missed |
• 5-minute read |
• Media spin exposed daily |
• Realtime media fact-checks |
• Concise story summaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
❤️ If you think we’re doing a good job, please help us stay independent with a one-time donation. |
|
|
🔎 Tip line: Have a story from your campus, community, or company that needs exposure? Send tips, questions, or ideas to tips@upward.news. |
👋 To say hello, respond to this email. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ni komentarjev:
Objavite komentar